Anti-vaxxers highlight political polarisation in North America

The title of this article is 'Anti-vaxxers highlight political polarisation in North America'. Gary Kasparov, a former world chess champion and anti-Putin activist, once told The New York Times: “China gives the world Covid, the West gives us the vaccine. ” This statement has been disputed by many, as they believe it oversimplifies the complexity of the pandemic. However, Kasparov failed to foresee a subsequent development: the rise of the anti-vax movement against Covid mandates in many Western countries, particularly across North America. Many Westerners take less pride in the West than Kasparov. Two scientists have won this year’s Nobel medicine prize for their breakthrough work that led to the mRNA Covid vaccine. Western governments were the first to roll it out and mass-distributed it among their populace. But far from cheering or taking pride in the medical advances, vaccine mandates have given rise to an international anti-vax movement that has become a fully fledged political force. Steve Bannon, an alt-right ideologue and former strategist for ex-US president Donald Trump, and feminist icon Naomi Wolf have become leaders of this movement that has ideologically morphed with the far-right in the US. Anti-vax and anti-government rhetoric share the same narrative template of conspiracy theory: the threat of authoritarian control. Former Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jnr, who will now run as an independent, was an avowed anti-vaxxer until he declared his presidential ambitions. So now, he is a proponent of “vaccine safety”. In Canada, tough Covid restrictions and vaccine mandates helped create the trucker convoy movement, a protest group that initially began with cross-border truckers but evolved into a national protest movement. It culminated in the protests in Ottawa and other cities that led to the imposition of a state of emergency in the capital. The protests, while noisy, were generally peaceful, but truckers’ organisers were arrested and put on trial like suspected terrorists, with their financial assets frozen. Their heavy-handed treatment by the federal authorities has polarised Canadian public opinion; their most famous defender has been the world-famous if controversial psychologist Jordan Peterson. Though the trucker’s convoy has been disbanded, its anti-federal stance on government overreach and alleged power abuse have very much been integrated into the ideologies of Canadian far-right groups. In Britain, controversial comedian Russell Brand has amassed millions of followers on his YouTube channel for voicing conspiracy theories including the dangers of Covid vaccination. Of course, vaccine resistance has a long history. In the late nineties and noughties, many parents opposed the combined childhood MMR [measles, mumps, and rubella] vaccine for its alleged, subsequently proven unfounded, links with autism and a bowel disease. In the 1970s, the safety of combined DTP [diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis] caused a panic in many countries. But vaccine controversies are as old as vaccination itself. The difference between those and the current anti-vax movement is that the latter has evolved into a full-blown political movement, at least in North America, and is fully integrated with the alt-right anti-government ideology. In this context, suppose we reverse Kasparov’s statement: the West gives the world a pandemic and China invents the vaccine cure. Without doubt, Chinese authorities would push this narrative heavily to promote national pride and superiority. But they wouldn’t need to push too hard because most Chinese are pretty nationalistic already. Science and technological breakthroughs in China, even if they are in the end replications or incremental improvements of Western technologies, can easily rally patriotic sentiments. Witness Huawei’s new 5G phone chip and the galvanising effect it has had in China on the Chinese-US chip war. Nowadays, virtually any public crisis can morph, especially in the US, into a full-scale political resistance movement. The democratic West has long considered divisions and diversity as sources of strength. The Chinese political tradition sees the opposite. The extreme polarisation experienced in some Western societies has cast a new light on this debate.