There can be no unity in Hong Kong if we cannot embrace disagreement

The Chief Executive of Hong Kong, John Lee Ka-chiu, recently delivered a policy address that spanned over three hours. The address was comprehensive, covering a multitude of topics. One of the most notable announcements was the HK$20,000 (US$2,555) cash bonus for each newborn, a move that was unprecedented and well-received. Another significant point was the relaxation of property cooling measures that have been in place for a decade. Although this was anticipated, it still made headlines. It's evident that the government has a challenging task ahead.

Lee's efforts to rally the people of Hong Kong and integrate them into the societal fold were particularly striking. He highlighted his community outreach efforts, including consultation sessions and district visits. He repeatedly emphasized that his policy address was intended for every single resident of Hong Kong. The sheer number of policy initiatives unveiled led Simon Lee, co-director of the International Business and Chinese Enterprise programme at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, to liken the blueprint to a buffet dinner.

Lee's policy initiatives were inclusive, extending to foreign talent and companies that could potentially contribute to Hong Kong's population. However, his positive discourse on unity and solidarity was undermined by his divisive 'us vs them' rhetoric. He attributed the frustration of Hong Kong's good citizens to the negativity harboured by some. This rhetoric created a divide, alienating those who may be sceptical about our future due to the numerous challenges we face. This approach risks exacerbating the negativity and obstructing the unity he seeks to foster.