英美協議聽起來不錯，但關鍵在於細節

In February, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer of the United Kingdom had a significant meeting with President Donald Trump. During this meeting, US Vice-President JD Vance expressed optimism, stating that there was a 'good chance' that a trade deal could be established between the UK and the US. He emphasized that this was due to a 'much more reciprocal relationship' that the UK has with the US compared to other European nations. Sarah Jones, the UK business and trade minister, welcomed Vance's remarks and confirmed that discussions to secure a deal with the US were ongoing. However, she refrained from providing a specific timeline for when these negotiations might conclude. She stated, 'Nobody wants tariffs. No one wants a tariff war. We want to secure a deal with the US. ' This indicates a strong desire to avoid additional taxes on goods exchanged between the two countries. The central question surrounding the positive comments from Vice-President Vance and Minister Jones is what they truly mean by the term 'deal. ' Following Prime Minister Starmer's visit to the White House, it was noteworthy that the UK delegation referred to the negotiations as an 'economic deal. ' This terminology was significant as it suggested that the discussions were not aimed at creating a comprehensive free trade agreement that would encompass nearly all goods. During Trump's first term, negotiations between the UK and the US progressed relatively smoothly until contentious issues regarding medicine pricing and food standards arose. Trump's team had indicated that they were waiting to see how closely the UK would adhere to European Union regulations following Brexit. Currently, it appears that the 'deal' being discussed is focused on collaboration in science, technology, and artificial intelligence, with the aim of avoiding tariffs. The US has expressed interest in addressing the UK's 'tech tax' on primarily American digital companies and has raised concerns regarding the Online Safety Act. However, a significant challenge has emerged. The US has imposed a 10% tax on UK imports, which they refer to as 'reciprocal tariffs. ' This means that the UK is facing additional charges for goods exported to the US. Interestingly, the UK actually purchases more from the US than the US imports from the UK. The prevailing sentiment in Washington is that this 10% tariff is not open for negotiation. It serves as the baseline tariff that has been applied to nearly all of America's trading partners. Making an exception for the UK could potentially lead to significant trade complications. The UK finds itself in a unique position compared to other nations. Many countries have faced higher tariffs, particularly those in East Asia, and they are keen to maintain the 10% rate. Consequently, the UK may not have much leverage in these negotiations, yet it is being treated quite harshly, especially considering that there is no trade deficit with the US. The UK has valid concerns, particularly since the automotive industry, which is crucial for Britain, is facing a 25% tariff. Another layer of complexity arises as these discussions unfold alongside the post-Brexit reset negotiations that are being outlined in anticipation of the upcoming UK-EU summit next month. Reports suggest that the UK and EU are eager to secure an ambitious deal that closely aligns on export regulations. The goal of this reset is to eliminate much of the bureaucratic red tape surrounding food and agricultural exports. The US has previously shown interest in this matter. Could the US potentially incorporate this into their negotiations? Additionally, many US officials have expressed a desire for allies to collaborate in containing China. The US might also attempt to pressure the UK into taking action to prevent the influx of diverted Chinese goods. This would contradict the UK government's narrative that Britain could become the 'most connected economy in the world,' with strong connections to European markets, US technology, and the East Asian market, including China. Lastly, there is an intriguing factor to consider. Given recent developments, the US now finds itself in a position where it needs these trade deals, particularly with its closest allies. The UK possesses more leverage in these discussions than it did just a month ago. While the Prime Minister may be hesitant to utilize this leverage, the US cannot afford to allow the UK to stall or withdraw from the negotiations.